Not One Candidate

09/29/2011

 
A recent editorial sums up both the GOP candidates and their followers pretty well:

 “Judging by the response of recent audiences,” reads a Sept. 25 editorial in the Concord Monitor, “the next Republican presidential primary debate should be held in a reproduction Roman coliseum, the proper venue to cheer the execution of one's fellow human beings.”

The editorial concludes, “The most disturbing aspect of the WrestleMania behavior at the debates is not that some audience members booed a soldier and many cheered death. It's that not one Republican candidate, and there were nine on the stage on Thursday, spoke up to admonish the crowd and call for civility. Not one candidate, in situations that cried out for it, exhibited leadership.”

That summary inspired this “Not One Candidate” video, distributed by the DNC. 
(posted on youtube by DemRapidResponse)
 
 
Normally, I can't stand to listen to Republican politicians, and because half of what they say is completely false (and the other half is just distorted truth). Still, I'll break down occasionally to listen to some of them just to catch the humorous gaffes they commonly make. 

But Rick Perry isn't one of those candidates. He says unbelievably stupid things (like, the government should have our schools should teach intelligent design), only to issue other stupid statements that defeat his first (like his later statement that the government should have nothing to do with schools). They're both horribly wrong and stabbingly insulting -  but they're hypocritical, too, since both of those conflicting statements come from the same mouth. 

And even though he sometimes tells the absolute truth, the fact he apparently intended to send a different message (like "George W. Bush did an incredible job in the presidency, defending us from freedom") makes such gaffes flat-out shocking instead of humorous. 

But I just found one take on Perry that makes his brand of verbalism hysterical. Instead of listening to his words, just read his lips and apply the words that he appears to mouth. And even funnier, you'll find he makes much more sense in this method than if you heard his actual words. The video's below. Check out the text crawl, and keep a close eye on Perry's mouth. The ... well, accuracy is quite impressive!
(created/posted on youtube by BadLipReading)

And just for comparison, here is Perry's original with the actual audio:  
(posted on youtube by RickPerryPresident)

And if you bothered to watch the second one, don't you agree that the satirical first video makes Perry sound so much better than he really is?  
 
 
We're a high-ranking state, that's for sure. 

But high-ranking in unemployment, under-funded schools and ignorant voters. 

So what does Gov. Nikki  Haley propose we do to improve the reputation of South Carolina? Simple - just lie. (Well, it's worked for her.)

Yesterday, Haley issued orders that all state government offices answer their phones by saying "It's a great day in South Carolina! How may I help you?" (All that's missing is, "would you like fries with that?")

Haley told The State,"I'm selling South Carolina as this great, new, positive state everybody needs to look at." 

Well, South Carolina Forward Progress made the video below that reminds us of just how everyone is looking at us to begin with. And how it was garbage from the state's GOP that got us that type of reputation. 
From SC Forward Progress

What's really ignorant about this is the type of phone calls state offices typically get. I feel sorry for staff who, after issuing their scripted message, have to listen to "where is the local unemployment office?" or "why is my Medicaid coverage being denied?" I wouldn't want to be in their shoes. 
 
 
Yet another update on Wisconsin Republicans attempting to practice a most non-Democratic, non-representational format of government – yesterday afternoon, citizens were forcibly removed from the state assembly for exercising their established legal rights in the state.

When the video (below) opens you see Rep. Peter Barca, the Dem minority leader (who’s fought hard against the GOP’s Gestapo tactics in Wisconsin so far this year), being interrupted by protests from the public audience.

But the protests aren’t against Barca or his statements; they’re against the capitol police who are removing that person because he’s videotaping the session.

State law allowing such videotaping has been on the books since 1977, though (Statute 19.90, also referred to as the “Wisconsin Photographers’ Bill of Rights”).

“Whenever a governmental body holds a meeting in open session, the body shall make a reasonable effort to accommodate any person desiring to record, film or photograph the meeting,” it reads. As long the photographer isn’t interfering with the session or its participants, he or she is allowed to film, and without need for permission beforehand.

After the citizen with the video camera gets removed, the session is then delayed by one who appears to be speaker pro tempore Bill Kramer, who requests other attendees in the gallery to put cameras away.

Next, in a not clearly audible statement, a woman from the gallery sounds as if she stipulates Statute 19.90 in defense of those citizens, but the assumed Kramer only responds with “that’s nice.”

He then tries to justify his forced removal of those Wisconsin citizens by citing something completely different – the state’s Assembly Rules, which were last modified earlier this year. “Under Assembly Rule 26, only credentialed members of the press are allowed to use recording devices in this chamber; guests may not,” he says.

But the assumed Kramer is wrong, and in two different ways. First of all, he’s citing the wrong rule. The only portion of Rule 26 that seems in any way relevant states “a person…may not possess or use in the assembly chamber a microphone designed to pick up conversation more than 10 feet away from the microphone.”  In other words, only the assembly can decide to amplify any discourse of a session, and no one can try to secretly broadcast it within the chambers. And it specifies “microphone” – it doesn’t say camera or video recorder.

Second, the rule he must have been thinking of isn’t pertinent, either. Assembly Rule 25  (“Admission to the floor of the assembly”) reads that only “representatives of news media that regularly publish or broadcast reports available to the general public who are actively engaged in reporting the proceedings of the assembly” are allowed on the assembly floor. But it has no restrictions on anyone – even non-media – from being present with cameras in the gallery, which is where these ejected persons were sitting. 
(posted to youtube by nicknicemadison)
 
 
Every time I find myself wading through Reddit and Digg and many other web forums and political blogs, I always wind up knee-deep in swill from Ron Paul fans. 

"Just who are these people?" I've wondered. "How can anyone capable of multi-syllabic expression actually support that racist, conniving leech?"

And it's left me with a blank image. I've never ever met a Paulite in person, so I've not been able to apply a physical image to these folks. I've made my own demographic assumptions and borrowed some from actual reports (mid-30s and younger, many still in school or in first full-time employment, first-time taxpayers or fearing their entry to that status), but I wanted to have a visual picture. 

Their arguments for the Republi-tarian all seem to lean towards Paul's assumed "pro-dope" political stance, but that hasn't helped me create an actual image of them, either. When I've tried to from that angle, all I could produce is a faceless, soon-to-be college dropout trying to keep the smoke from his bong from rolling under the dorm room door so his RA won't bust him.

But today, ladies and gentleman, I found this video. And it gives the clearest picture of how an actual a-Paul-stle would not only look in public, but how he or she would actually behave, too. 
(Originally from National Geographic's "Frontier Force," appearing on youtube)

The image and behavior of this belligerent drunk gives me a rather accurate image of a Paulite, I'm sure. 

Ron Paul picked up these supporters through a states' rights argument, which he's milked out in allusion to legalization of marijuana.  He's only using that angle to hide his neoconfederate goals, but that's where these "Weedheads for Paul" originate from. 

And apparently they're celebrating their supposedly pro-dope hero too much ("...toke up ... I mean, vote for Ron Paul!"), because they're overlooking everything else there is to know about the guy. 

To the rest of the world, Paul's a racist. Long been known to be, as well. His constituent newsletters have been chock full of racist terms, he continues to argue against the Civil Rights Act, and he openly takes campaign donations from white supremacist groups. He was even endorsed by former KKK leader David Duke. 

He's told ridiculous stories, like the one about the Affordable Healthcare Act. The act will have the IRS put 16,000 armed agents on the street to enforce the new law, he told the public. 

The doctor's openly stated that "you don't have a right to medical care," as well. He even voted against the Amber Alert bill, for pete's sake. 

He also practices a political ploy that clearly defeats the image those Paulites seem to hide behind. He says one thing, does the opposite, and then dons some stylish cloak as he backpedals away in attempt to hide his blatant hypocrisy. 

For example, Paul argues against earmarks, but loads bills up with tons of them -- then votes against those same bills after he's sure they'll pass without his vote.  Same thing on the subject of term limits; we should have them, Paul's cried -- right after he was re-elected for additional terms. 

From the debate podiums, Paul preaches about some isolationist peacefulness -- but takes sizable donations from the president of Xe (formerly known as Blackwater), the private mercenary corporation, and even had CIA subcontractors through Blackwater working his last campaign

And even though he welcomed about $600 million to his district from FEMA after recent hurricanes, he still commands the news cameras lately by claiming the government should do nothing to support victims of natural disasters. 

Seeing that video, and now being able to accurately picture those Paulites, I must say I'm relieved. That visual depiction confirms my well-founded conclusion that they're an invalid, weakly-based microgroup. And any online presence they currently sustain will soon wane away. 

After all, even if Paul is able to last through the early GOP primaries next year, his dopehead devotees can't vote from jail, which is where many are sure to wind up. 
 
 
It's bad enough that Wisconsin's Rep. Paul Ryan keeps spewing absolute garbage about Medicare and Social Security (he fraudulently refers to the programs as "entitlements"), which he wants to privatize. 

But when a recipient of those programs contests his statements, it gets even worse. A 71-year-old man was grabbed by security, dragged out of the room and knocked to the ground after interrupting Ryan's drivel.  
from AMERICAblog

And then the chump cracks a joke about the old man, too? Something tells me this will come back on Ryan - and pretty damn soon. 

 
 
What might be the future job scene in America? Well, if it keeps the current path of sending our jobs overseas, according to this video, we could wind up only with "jobs that no one in China would do."
 
 
Contributors to the Daily Show offer their take on the original Tea Party, the folks using that name currently, and their overall relevance. 

One quote that sums it (and them) up best? "A fourth grader's understanding of U.S. history." 
 
 
No money for public education - but big bucks available for her and her staff to visit Europe?
 
 
Picture
When many people notice problems in their communities, they just look the other way. Others might take the time to notify a representative, but don’t do much else to correct the situation.

But when Bob Aubin continued to see problems in his West Ashley community – problems that region’s city council representative has still failed to address, he finds – he decided to take a new method of response: become a representative, dammit, and address the problems himself.

Two weeks ago, Aubin officially entered the race for District 9 of Charleston’s city council.  He’ll face incumbent Aubry Alexander in the November 8 election.

Aubin’s made a point of being politically active for some time now. He’s been a regional chair of DFA, a volunteer to the Obama campaign in ’08, and last year aided the races of U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn and gubernatorial candidate Vincent Sheheen.

But the political experience and insight he’s developed wasn’t what called him to enter the race. Instead, it was a very personal observation – one he’s made all too frequently in his neighborhood.

“I saw a woman running across Sam Rittenberg Blvd with her two young children to get to the bus stop across from the St Andrew’s library,” Aubin recalls. It made him recall a recent tragedy; a pedestrian was struck by a vehicle and killed near that same location in April. Two other pedestrian fatalities occurred in the same West Ashley area in the last two years, as well.  

 “I wanted to be able to make a change,” he then determined, relieved to see the mom and kids eventually cross the large highway, “and I felt the City Government could do something about it.”

But it hasn’t, at least not on the incumbent’s watch. “While (these hazards) go on, Alexander's signature issue has been getting the city to put a kayak launch on the Ashley River.” Traffic safety remains unaddressed, even ignored, Aubin says, along with other vital issues.  

Those topics of transportation and safety are focal points in Aubin’s campaign, too.  More sidewalks and pedestrian crosswalks are needed in the community, he says, along with additions of bicycle lanes and better public transportation offerings. 

Such improvements could address specific needs in West Ashley, too, he says, noting Dist. 9’s high rates of bicyclists and bus travelers, as well as the poor conditions of CARTA bus stops in the area.

Other platform topics (which Aubin appropriately refers to on his website as “values”) include transparency and accountability, employment and education, and protection of the community’s environment.

That latter value was another point aiding his decision to run against Alexander, whose response to a particular environmental issue was … well, lacking in foundation, to say the least, according to Aubin.  

When Mayor Riley introduced a plan to add charging stations for electric-powered automobiles in city parking garages, Alexander loudly opposed, calling the concept “green welfare.”

But the low-cost project was to be funded by the federal government at no cost to Charleston. Many in the city drive such vehicles. And the mayor thought it would be good for business, too. As for costs of operation, “(it) was figured to be $300 to $500 a year to the city,” Aubin says, “but Alexander was still totally opposed.”

That resistance to a cheap project that would produce high-value benefits was the final straw. “That term he used [“green welfare”] was a big factor in my choice to oppose him,” Aubin says.

Alexander first won the city council seat in 2007. He ran unopposed in the election, but about 18 percent of the Dist. 9 voters who went to the polls that day skipped that particular race, not bothering to cast a vote for him.

That apparent voter disinterest from four years ago could be cemented in 2011 due to Alexander’s failure to address issues that still hinder the district.

A real estate broker by trade, Alexander’s most news-catching accomplishment as councilman was his receipt of a Certificate of Achievement for taking some leadership courses through the National League of Cities. He lists the NLC credits along with other training seminars he completed on his city council website page.

But while Alexander only chose to learn from attending outside seminars, Aubin’s been learning first-hand, on the spot, and directly from the people in West Ashley.

He’s canvassing. Speaking with his neighbors. Learning of their needs. Telling of his goals. And, aided by his wife Courtney, he’s winning their votes in the process, too (along with a few campaign donations).

And you can speak with Aubin yourself next week. His official campaign kickoff is next Thursday, Sept. 8 (check his site’s calendar page for updates and details).

Until then, you can visit his website or his facebook page. You can send him an email if you have any questions. If you can’t make it next Monday, you just might see him personally over the next few weeks between now and election day (November 8), too.

But if you do see him, folks, remember to look out for him and other pedestrians when you’re driving through that West Ashley part of town. And unless you’re Aubry Alexander, don’t plan on using the kayak excuse.